-
decisions-of-court-regarding-17-a
-
Decision of High court Lahore and Secretary Education in favour of age relaxation for ex.armed employees
-
Decision of Service Terbunal in connection with Appeal No.3538/2014
-
Decision of Secretary School Education Punjab against the presentation of Ghulam Murtaza Bhatti in connection with writ petition No.20909/2015
-
Decision of High Court Lahore Multan Bench for suspension of impugned orders under reallocation policy
-
Reviewal writ petition of PEA Punjab for pay protection
-
Decision of high court Lahore in connection with 45% house rent to all big cities
-
Decision of Worthy High Court Multan Bench in connection with regular appointment under 17-A Rule
-
Decision of Secretary Education in favour of Writ petition 7477/2012 for consideration of Promotion cases of teachers (General cadre) in EX.MCL Schools for SS
-
Decision of worthy High Court refarding GAT test
-
Decision of Secretary Education against IT Teachers’s Demand of BS-17
-
Decision of worthy High Court in favour of Reallocation policy 2013
-
Court Decision about 17-A rules
-
Orders of Worthy High Court against the transfers of DTEs in Punjab
-
Up-Gradation of Deputy Accountants from BPS-14 to BPS-16-Decision of the Punjab Service Tribunal
-
Decision of worthy supreme court on miserable conditions of school in pakistan
-
Decision of worthy High Court Multan Bench against stoppage of increment on low results
-
Decision of worthy high court for upgradation of clerical post dated 18-05-2012
-
Decision of ombudsman for upgradation of clerical posts
-
Decision of worthy high court lahore regarding rule 17-A,qouta for children of died civil servant punjab
-
Decision of Worthy High Court in writ petition # 16459-13 about re-allocation from khushab
-
writ petition against reallocation from khushab
-
Decision of chier secretary punjab against the pay protection,service protection and scale upgradation in writ petition 26022 by PEA punjab through Advocate hafiz tariq nasim
-
Application to the chairman services tribunal for seniority of contract educators from 2000 to 2009
-
Decision Of High Court For Rationalization 2010
-
Orders of Supreme Court in writ petition 1536/2009 dated 21-10-2009 for regularization of educators
-
orders of Cheif Secretary Punjab against pay protection writ petition 6560 and 26930
-
Writ petition 26930 by AK Dogar
-
Writ petition 4617 by Muhammad Bashir
-
Writ petition 618 by Malik Saleem Iqbal
-
Writ Petition 26022 by Hafiz Tariq Nasim
-
Supreme court order dated 5th october 2009
-
Presentation to Chief Secretary for Writ petition 26930 and 6560
-
PEA negotiation with CM Punjab
-
Presentation to Secretary Education for Writ petition 26022
-
Finance department letter for recovery dated 31 june 2011
-
Age Relaxation letter by S GAD in contract policy 2004
-
recruitment against in-service quota dated 06 may 2011
-
fee concession for sons-daughters of employees from bs-1 to bs-16 – 2011
-
stay order for writ petition 6560 dated 29 april 2010
-
AG Punjab letter dated 22 august 2011
Advertisements
Salam
When the decision is expected for ese, sese Arts?
sir i m very anxious to know whether in SESE and ESE educators in punjab can b sued for not given the preference to the male candidates in their respective male seats rather than female candidates in male domain?
asslamualaikum , Dear sir, i am from kpk, shangla district, got M.phil degree in agriculture (agronomy), i need the lahore high court decision about, that the agriculture students are eligible to nts for biology and chemistry posts in education department. bps-16.
any cooperation in this regard will be highly appreciated.
when government regular educaters of 2012 .
please need to go court for justice. upward mobility package for sst. we do not demand extra.please give us already given as est and pst wef 01.12.2009 including retired/promoted/died after 1.12.09 each year.because same package was given to all 3 catagories ie pst,est,sst.but1st 2 were upgraded and their package was revised.hence some clarifications were made then which were not clear in orignal notification of 2007.here word sst was not mentioned because sst was upgraded.but other all amendments are supposed for all 3 catagories in common sense.but cruelty against is dubbled when others were upgraded and sst was ignored .simple clarifications which were equally for all but sst is still weeping and waiting.plz resolve it for God
asslamualaikum,sir i want to know if any case is done in any court against nts from teachers? please inform mr (030006250918)